Following the blueprint II: A new Biblical Hebrew syntactic outline derived from Harald Weinrich
Following my critique of Niccacci’s methodological stances, I establish a new interpretation of Biblical Hebrew word order derived from Harald Weinrich’s Tempus. Its word order mirrors the opposition between comment and narrative registers. I describe the reasons for attributing a narrative function...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Sage
[2020]
|
In: |
Journal for the study of the Old Testament
Year: 2020, Volume: 44, Issue: 4, Pages: 733-756 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Commentary
/ Story
/ Niccacci, Alviero 1940-2018
/ Weinrich, Harald 1927-2022
/ Discourse analysis
/ Textual linguistics
/ Polotsky, Hans Jakob 1905-1991
|
IxTheo Classification: | HB Old Testament |
Further subjects: | B
Discourse Analysis
B Harald Weinrich B Keywords Comment / narrative B background / foreground B Comment / narrative B TEXT LINGUISTICS B zero-degree |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | Following my critique of Niccacci’s methodological stances, I establish a new interpretation of Biblical Hebrew word order derived from Harald Weinrich’s Tempus. Its word order mirrors the opposition between comment and narrative registers. I describe the reasons for attributing a narrative function to the wayyiqtol and wqatal (verb-first) sentences while reserving the comment function to xqatal, xyiqtol, and xparticiple (verb-second) sentences. The occasional occurrence of a comment sentence in indirect speech is, in most cases, the syntactic mark of the narrator’s addresses to the reader. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1476-6728 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal for the study of the Old Testament
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0309089219868655 |