How the Story Appears in the Patristic Literature

This essay explores the various ways that the Patristic writings interpreted three elements of the Gadarene Demoniac story (Matt 8:28–34) that are unique to Matthew’s telling: the number of demoniacs, and the phrases “before the time” and “no one could go through that way.” Concerning the number of...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Autres titres:Abweichender Titel:The Demoniacs in the Gospel of Matthew
Auteur principal: Hatter, Jonathan (Auteur)
Type de support: Imprimé Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Publié: 2019
Dans: Annali di storia dell'esegesi
Année: 2019, Volume: 36, Numéro: 2, Pages: 333-341
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Die Heilung des Besessenen von Gerasa / Démonologie / Patristique
Classifications IxTheo:HC Nouveau Testament
KAB Christianisme primitif
NBH Angélologie
Sujets non-standardisés:B Bible . Matthew; Criticism, Narrative
B Interprétation
B Demoniacs
B Matthew
B Patristic
B Reception
B Bible . Matthew; Criticism, interpretation
B Jesus Christ
B Bible; Criticism, interpretation; History0030-600
B Healing of the Gerasene demoniac (Miracle)
Description
Résumé:This essay explores the various ways that the Patristic writings interpreted three elements of the Gadarene Demoniac story (Matt 8:28–34) that are unique to Matthew’s telling: the number of demoniacs, and the phrases “before the time” and “no one could go through that way.” Concerning the number of demoniacs, we see that while the earliest texts seem content to conflate details from multiple gospel accounts, later authors develop an interest in objective harmonization, offering unique interpretations for why Matthew has two demoniacs while the other versions of the story have only one. Concerning Jesus’s appearance “before the time,” there is a consensus among the authors that this should be understood in an apocalyptic framework, familiar from texts like Revelation and 1 Enoch. Finally, concerning the blocking of the way, we find that the early interpreters of the story were mostly silent on this Matthean detail, offering only a few limited comments.
ISSN:1120-4001
Contient:Enthalten in: Annali di storia dell'esegesi