Are economics a key to dating Urdeuteronomium? A response to Sandra Lynn Richter
While welcoming Sandra Richter’s suggestion in a recent Journal for the Study of the Old Testament article that economics should be integrated in the study of Deuteronomy, a number of points in her argument to date Urdeuteronomium in the Iron Age I-II transition are inaccurate or based on contestabl...
| Authors: | ; ; ; |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Sage
[2020]
|
| In: |
Journal for the study of the Old Testament
Year: 2020, Volume: 45, Issue: 1, Pages: 65-78 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Iron age
/ Classical antiquity
/ Economy
/ Deuteronomium
/ Khirbet Qeiyafa
/ Chirbet Raddana
/ Risk aversion
/ Silver
|
| IxTheo Classification: | HB Old Testament HH Archaeology |
| Further subjects: | B
risk aversion
B Silver B Barter B Ancient economics B Urdeuteronomium B Deuteronomy B Khirbet Qeyafa B Khirbet Raddana |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | While welcoming Sandra Richter’s suggestion in a recent Journal for the Study of the Old Testament article that economics should be integrated in the study of Deuteronomy, a number of points in her argument to date Urdeuteronomium in the Iron Age I-II transition are inaccurate or based on contestable assumptions and arguments from silence. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1476-6728 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal for the study of the Old Testament
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0309089219882442 |