A Critique of Torleif Elgvin’s Reconstructions of 1QSamuel
The article by Torleif Elgvin in ZAW 132/2 (2020): 281-300 fails in the material reconstruction of 1QSam. Considering the different width of the columns correctly, the manuscript could well have contained all parts of 2Sam 20-23 which makes further speculations superfluous.
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Contributors: | |
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
De Gruyter
[2021]
|
In: |
Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft
Year: 2021, Volume: 133, Issue: 1, Pages: 56-63 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Dead Sea scrolls, Qumran Scrolls
/ Manuscript
/ Exegesis
/ Textual criticism
|
IxTheo Classification: | HD Early Judaism HH Archaeology |
Further subjects: | B
Bibel. Samuel, 2., 20-23
|
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Rights Information: | InC 1.0 |
Summary: | The article by Torleif Elgvin in ZAW 132/2 (2020): 281-300 fails in the material reconstruction of 1QSam. Considering the different width of the columns correctly, the manuscript could well have contained all parts of 2Sam 20-23 which makes further speculations superfluous. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1613-0103 |
Reference: | Kommentar zu "1QSamuel–A Pre-canonical Shorter Recension of 2Samuel (2020)"
|
Contains: | Enthalten in: Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1515/zaw-2021-0005 |