The Reception and Idealization of the Torah in the Letter of Aristeas: The Case of the Dietary Laws
In the Letter of Aristea, the dietary laws are presented as a paradigm for the entire Torah. However, the summary of the dietary laws provided by the author of the Letter for the most does not quote literally the biblical texts, but shows a considerable degree of interpretation of these laws. This p...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Mohr Siebeck
2020
|
In: |
Hebrew bible and ancient Israel
Year: 2020, Volume: 9, Issue: 4, Pages: 435-447 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Aristeas, Epistolographus ca. 3 BC. Jh.
/ Josephus, Flavius 37-100
/ Philo, Alexandrinus 25 BC-40
/ Halacha
/ Food laws
/ Interpretation of
/ Law
/ Dead Sea scrolls, Qumran Scrolls
|
IxTheo Classification: | HB Old Testament HD Early Judaism |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | In the Letter of Aristea, the dietary laws are presented as a paradigm for the entire Torah. However, the summary of the dietary laws provided by the author of the Letter for the most does not quote literally the biblical texts, but shows a considerable degree of interpretation of these laws. This paper examines the relationship between biblical traditions and Greek cultural referents in the presentation of the dietary and sacrificial laws of the Letter, against the background of other texts of Second Temple period which show a reception of these laws (e. g. Philo, Josephus, Qumran texts). It argues that, while the representation of the dietary laws in the Letter attests to a considerable authority of this section of the Torah from a symbolic point of view, they offer still little evidence as for the practice and the contents of a dietary halacha. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2192-2284 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Hebrew bible and ancient Israel
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1628/hebai-2020-0027 |