The Recovery of the Nazirite in Carolingian Discourse
Carolingian exegetes Hrabanus Maurus and Paschasius Radbertus encountered a paradox in the sources available to them regarding the prophecy of Dan and its representative Samson, the archetypal Nazirite, “Let Dan be a snake in the way, a serpent in the path, that biteth the horse’s heels that his rid...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
De Gruyter
2021
|
In: |
Journal of the bible and its reception
Year: 2021, Volume: 8, Issue: 1, Pages: 61-78 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Hrabanus, Maurus 780-856
/ Paschasius Radbertus 785-865
/ Samson Biblical character
/ Nazirite
/ Reception
/ Frankish Empire
/ History 687-840
|
IxTheo Classification: | HB Old Testament KAD Church history 500-900; early Middle Ages |
Further subjects: | B
Paschasius Radbertus
B Hrabanus Maurus B Carolingian period B Nazirite B Samson |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | Carolingian exegetes Hrabanus Maurus and Paschasius Radbertus encountered a paradox in the sources available to them regarding the prophecy of Dan and its representative Samson, the archetypal Nazirite, “Let Dan be a snake in the way, a serpent in the path, that biteth the horse’s heels that his rider may fall backward. I will look for thy salvation, O Lord” (Gen 49:17-8). While in some sources, the blessing given to Dan in Genesis 49:17 is interpreted as foreshadowing Christ, in others it is seen as reflecting the Antichrist. In this article, I explore how these Carolingian exegetes rose to the challenge of this conflict, by the examining the sources for both approaches available to them. I argue that both exegetes engaged with the sources in a manner that bypassed the paradox, each choosing a different way to do so. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2329-4434 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal of the bible and its reception
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1515/jbr-2020-0003 |