Epilog, Ouvertüre oder Intermezzo?: Zur ursprünglichen Funktion von 2 Clem 19,1–20,4
2 Clem 19.1–20.4, probably a later addition to 2 Clem 1–18.2; 20.5, bears striking intertextual links to 1 Clem. This points to the original function of this passage: It served as some sort of bridge-text between the public reading of 2 Clem 1–18.2; 20.5 and 1 Clem. Because of this, 2 Clem 19.1–20.4...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | German |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Mohr Siebeck
2013
|
In: |
Early christianity
Year: 2013, Volume: 4, Issue: 2, Pages: 242-260 |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Parallel Edition: | Electronic
|
Summary: | 2 Clem 19.1–20.4, probably a later addition to 2 Clem 1–18.2; 20.5, bears striking intertextual links to 1 Clem. This points to the original function of this passage: It served as some sort of bridge-text between the public reading of 2 Clem 1–18.2; 20.5 and 1 Clem. Because of this, 2 Clem 19.1–20.4 witnesses an early combination of two formerly independent texts, i.e.1 Clem and 2 Clem. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1868-8020 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Early christianity
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1628/186870313X13667164610039 |