(Why) Was Jesus the Galilean Crucified Alone?: Solving a False Conundrum

One of the objections raised against the hypothesis that Jesus was involved in anti-Roman seditious activity runs as follows: if Jesus was put to death as an insurrectionist, why was he arrested and crucified alone, whilst his followers were left unharmed? Although this is regarded as a real conundru...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Bermejo Rubio, Fernando (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Publié: 2013
Dans: Journal for the study of the New Testament
Année: 2013, Volume: 36, Numéro: 2, Pages: 127-154
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Kreuzigung Jesu
Sujets non-standardisés:B (false) conundrums
B Jesus the Galilean
B Crucifixion
B seditious activity
B Identity
Accès en ligne: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Édition parallèle:Non-électronique
Description
Résumé:One of the objections raised against the hypothesis that Jesus was involved in anti-Roman seditious activity runs as follows: if Jesus was put to death as an insurrectionist, why was he arrested and crucified alone, whilst his followers were left unharmed? Although this is regarded as a real conundrum by the guild, the present article proposes that the question has been incorrectly formulated, because it uncritically assumes that Jesus was indeed crucified alone. The article argues that both sound reasoning and significant evidence point to the fact that some followers of Jesus—or at least people related to him through a shared ideology and/or activities—were sought after and crucified along with him. In turn, this allows us to understand in a novel way the reasons for the collective crucifixion at Golgotha.
ISSN:1745-5294
Contient:Enthalten in: Journal for the study of the New Testament
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1177/0142064X13506166