A Revival of the Succession Narrative and the Case against It
This article questions Joseph Blenkinsopp's recent defence of the ‘Succession Narrative’ against John Van Seters's views, set forth in The Biblical Saga of King David (2009). In this debate with Blenkinsopp, Van Seters discusses the extent of the literary work that includes within it both...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Sage
2014
|
| In: |
Journal for the study of the Old Testament
Year: 2014, Volume: 39, Issue: 1, Pages: 3-14 |
| Further subjects: | B
Icelandic sagas
B Succession Narrative B Joseph Blenkinsopp B David |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Electronic
|
| Summary: | This article questions Joseph Blenkinsopp's recent defence of the ‘Succession Narrative’ against John Van Seters's views, set forth in The Biblical Saga of King David (2009). In this debate with Blenkinsopp, Van Seters discusses the extent of the literary work that includes within it both the ‘Succession Narrative’ and the ‘Story of David's Rise’, the genre that is most appropriate for this work—whether history of a recent past or saga of another age—and the social and historical setting in which it was written. Van Seters defends his view that the David Saga was a story written in the fourth century BCE about David's reign, a work of literature which was critical of the monarchy and any hope of its messianic restoration. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1476-6728 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal for the study of the Old Testament
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0309089214551510 |