Keine Quästoren in Korinth: Zu Goodrichs (und Theißens) These über das Amt des Erastos (Röm 16.23)
In a recent article, Goodrich has revived the thesis of Theissen, that Erastos, the οἰκονόμος τῆς πόλεως (Rom 16.23), held the office of quaestor when Paul met him in Corinth. This article, however, argues that the municipal office of quaestor did not exist in Corinth., German abstract: Goodrich hat...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | German |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
2010
|
In: |
New Testament studies
Year: 2010, Volume: 56, Issue: 4, Pages: 576-581 |
Further subjects: | B
Romans 16
B Social status B Erastos B Corinth |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Parallel Edition: | Electronic
|
Summary: | In a recent article, Goodrich has revived the thesis of Theissen, that Erastos, the οἰκονόμος τῆς πόλεως (Rom 16.23), held the office of quaestor when Paul met him in Corinth. This article, however, argues that the municipal office of quaestor did not exist in Corinth., German abstract: Goodrich hat kürzlich die These von Theißen wiederaufgenommen, Erastos, der οἰκονόμος τῆς πόλεως (Röm 16.23), habe das Amt des Quästors bekleidet, als Paulus ihm in Korinth begegnete. Dieser Beitrag will dagegen zeigen, dass das städtische Amt eines Quästors in Korinth nicht existierte. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1469-8145 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: New Testament studies
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0028688510000160 |