A Structural Commentary on the So-Called Antilegomena: Volume 2. The Letter of Jude: Expecting for the Mercy
Most commentators view the Epistle of Jude as a parenetic text. The commentary “Expecting for the Mercy” highlights its soteriological and Christological contents. This has been possible by taking a structural approach to the text and showing that its structure is chiastic, with Jude 14–15 at its ce...
| Authors: | ; |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Book |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Göttingen
Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
[2021]
|
| In: |
Eastern and Central European voices (3,2)
Year: 2021 |
| Reviews: | [Rezension von: Wojciechowska, Kalina, 1971-, A structural commentary on the so-called Antilegomena] (2022) (Tomczyk, Dominik)
|
| Series/Journal: | Eastern and Central European voices
3,2 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
James
B Jude |
| Further subjects: | B
Antilegomena
B Neues Testament B Brief des Judas |
| Online Access: |
Cover Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Rights Information: | Creative Commons License BY-NC-ND 4.0 |
| Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
| Summary: | Most commentators view the Epistle of Jude as a parenetic text. The commentary “Expecting for the Mercy” highlights its soteriological and Christological contents. This has been possible by taking a structural approach to the text and showing that its structure is chiastic, with Jude 14–15 at its centre – a description of the eschatological judgment foretold from the beginning of the world. The judgment is seen primarily as a time to show mercy to the faithful. Knowing this, the believers should also show mercy to the straying. Placing Jude 14–15 at the centre of the theological reflection has allowed us to reveal the hermeneutic perspective applied to interpret apocalyptic texts. The narrator interprets this kind of texts from the Christocentric angle, just like all other writings belonging to the Jewish tradition. In addition, he uses typology and the pesher method. The commentary is ecumenical, taking into account both Catholic and Lutheran perspectives. Angaben zur beteiligten Person Rosik: Dr. Mariusz Rosik is Professsor for New Testament Exegesis, Biblical Environment and Jewish History at the Pontifical Faculty of Theology and at the University of Wrocław, Poland. Angaben zur beteiligten Person Pietkiewicz: Rajmund Pietkiewicz is professor and vice-president of the Pontifical Faculty of Theology in Wrocław. Angaben zur beteiligten Person Pilarczyk: Dr. Krzysztof Pilarczyk is professor at the institute of Religious Studies at the Jagiellonian Universtity, Krakow. |
|---|---|
| ISBN: | 366657338X |
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.13109/9783666573385 |