Archaeology's Publication Problems by J. Aviram and H. Shanks
Lamentations over the condition of archaeological publication abound these days. A recent volume of essays-of distinguished provenance-rounds up the usual suspects. Yet a fundamental point is altogether missing from its discussion. What archaeologists observe and can readily document is emplacement,...
Auteur principal: | |
---|---|
Type de support: | Électronique Review |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
Publié: |
1998
|
Dans: |
Near Eastern archaeology
Année: 1998, Volume: 61, Numéro: 2, Pages: 118-120 |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Compte-rendu de lecture
|
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Résumé: | Lamentations over the condition of archaeological publication abound these days. A recent volume of essays-of distinguished provenance-rounds up the usual suspects. Yet a fundamental point is altogether missing from its discussion. What archaeologists observe and can readily document is emplacement, i.e., the cultural remains they identify in the ground. What retards publication is concentration on the depositional inferences from this record. Focusing on emplacement would both speed publication and enforce a truly essential methodological distinction. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2325-5404 |
Contient: | Enthalten in: Near Eastern archaeology
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.2307/3210641 |