The Galilean Crisis and Jesus Research Past and Present: A Response to Paula Fredriksen, Sarah Rollens, and Jens Schröter
The author offers a grateful reply to his three respondents before clarifying a few matters and responding to queries. Nothing emerges that would require modifications to the main arguments of the book.
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Brill
2022
|
In: |
Journal for the study of the historical Jesus
Year: 2022, Volume: 20, Issue: 2, Pages: 127-143 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Jesus Christus
/ Historicity
/ Reader-response criticism
/ Method
/ Gospels
|
IxTheo Classification: | HC New Testament KAB Church history 30-500; early Christianity |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | The author offers a grateful reply to his three respondents before clarifying a few matters and responding to queries. Nothing emerges that would require modifications to the main arguments of the book. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1745-5197 |
Reference: | Kommentar zu "[Rezension von: Ferda, Tucker S., Jesus, the Gospels, and the Galilean crisis] (2022)"
Kommentar zu "Remarks on Tucker S. Ferda, Jesus, the Gospels and the Galilean Crisis (2022)" Kommentar zu "An Inconsistent Truth? Reflections on Tucker Ferda’s: Jesus, the Gospels, and the Galilean Crisis (2022)" |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal for the study of the historical Jesus
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/17455197-bja10007 |