Discourse Prominence in Matthew 20,1-16: Stanley Porter's Verbal Aspect Theory applied
While traditionally grammarians have understood the Greek verbal system as grammaticalizing time and/or Aktionsart, there is growing acknowledgment that the Greek verbal system is fundamentally aspectual. There is also increasing recognition that verbal aspect can function to provide the author with...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
[publisher not identified]
2009
|
In: |
Filología neotestamentaria
Year: 2009, Volume: 22, Pages: 41-54 |
Further subjects: | B
Matthew 20,1-16
B Greek verbal system |
Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
Summary: | While traditionally grammarians have understood the Greek verbal system as grammaticalizing time and/or Aktionsart, there is growing acknowledgment that the Greek verbal system is fundamentally aspectual. There is also increasing recognition that verbal aspect can function to provide the author with the subjective choice to define discourse prominence within any given context. Much of the scholarship done on the subject of verbal aspect with regard to discourse prominence has been done at a theoretical level leaving the majority of the New Testament open for the application of the theory. It is the purpose of this study to apply the results of verbal aspect theory articulated by Stanley E. Porter to the pericope found in Matthew 20,1-16 in order to test the viability of aspect functioning to indicate prominence. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0214-2996 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Filología neotestamentaria
|