THE OMER POLEMICS IN "4Q513" FRAGMENTS 3-4 IS ANANNI THEIR AUTHOR?
Scholars have different interpretations for the clause אשר הר[א]ה֯ ענני of 4Q513. This paper argues that it should be rendered "which/as Ananni has sh[o]wn." Ananni is the name of the author cited in this polemic concerning the dating of the raising of the Omer, stating that it should alwa...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Peeters
2001
|
| In: |
Revue de Qumran
Year: 2001, Volume: 20, Issue: 1, Pages: 93-108 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | Scholars have different interpretations for the clause אשר הר[א]ה֯ ענני of 4Q513. This paper argues that it should be rendered "which/as Ananni has sh[o]wn." Ananni is the name of the author cited in this polemic concerning the dating of the raising of the Omer, stating that it should always occur on a Sunday. La phrase de 4Q513 אשר הר[א]ה֯ ענני a été interprétée de diverses manières. Cet article propose de la traduire « ce que/comme Annani a montré. » Annani serait le nom de l'auteur cité dans cette polémique sur la date de l'élévation de l'Omer, qui devrait tomber toujours un dimanche. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2506-7567 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Revue de Qumran
|