Abschaffung der Tora bei Gesetzeskennern?: Beobachtungen an und zu Röm 7,1-6
Rom 7,1-6 is much disputed, especially the meaning of 'law'. Should it be understood as law in general or as 'Torah'? Is it esteemed as abolished by Christ? What about 'freedom from law' (see v. 3)? The exegetical disagreements (I.), the ambiguities of the passage (II.)...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | German |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
2022
|
| In: |
Biblica
Year: 2022, Volume: 103, Issue: 2, Pages: 254-268 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Paul Apostle
/ Bible. Römerbrief 7,1-6
/ nomos
|
| IxTheo Classification: | HC New Testament |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | Rom 7,1-6 is much disputed, especially the meaning of 'law'. Should it be understood as law in general or as 'Torah'? Is it esteemed as abolished by Christ? What about 'freedom from law' (see v. 3)? The exegetical disagreements (I.), the ambiguities of the passage (II.) and its structure (III.) are considered. The passage connects a marriage-rule with the relationship(s) of the addressees to the dying and resurrected Christ — within an ethical perspective (IV., V.). Result: It is thought of as Torah, which means that the ethical content of the law has not been given up on the basis of the Christ-event (VI.). |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2385-2062 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Biblica
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.2143/BIB.103.2.3290914 |