Rm 1,18-3,20 Incohérence ou cohérence de l'argumentation paulinienne?
The coherence of the Pauline affirmations in Rom 1-3, especially comparing 2,6-16 with 3,20, has too often been discussed without taking into consideration the logic of the Apostle's language. This article shows how the rhetorical model and the juridical framework allow one to trace the logic o...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | French |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
1988
|
| In: |
Biblica
Year: 1988, Volume: 69, Issue: 1, Pages: 47-62 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | The coherence of the Pauline affirmations in Rom 1-3, especially comparing 2,6-16 with 3,20, has too often been discussed without taking into consideration the logic of the Apostle's language. This article shows how the rhetorical model and the juridical framework allow one to trace the logic of the passage and to determine its intent. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2385-2062 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Biblica
|