Challenging the two-source hypothesis
In view of the fact that the two-source hypothesis as solution to the synoptic problem is not generally accepted, and further in view of the fact that the proponents of the Griesbach hypothesis are literarily quite active, this article weighs up the two hypotheses against each other, making particul...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Gargar...
|
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publicado: |
1996
|
| En: |
Neotestamentica
Año: 1996, Volumen: 30, Número: 1, Páginas: 89-101 |
| Otras palabras clave: | B
Theology
B Synoptic Problem B Mark B Christianity |
| Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Sumario: | In view of the fact that the two-source hypothesis as solution to the synoptic problem is not generally accepted, and further in view of the fact that the proponents of the Griesbach hypothesis are literarily quite active, this article weighs up the two hypotheses against each other, making particular use of two commentaries on Mark which were written by Griesbach proponents, namely Mann (1986) and Riley (1989). |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2518-4628 |
| Obras secundarias: | Enthalten in: Neotestamentica
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.10520/AJA2548356_433 |