The weeping sinner
The difficulty and the ambiguous nature of any distinction between Luke and his possible non-Marken information with regard to Lk 7:36-50 are exposed. This is shown by means of three topics: the language of the pericope, consideration of the story in the context of the Gospel as a whole, and the inn...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
Published: |
2000
|
In: |
Neotestamentica
Year: 2000, Volume: 34, Issue: 1, Pages: 87-102 |
Further subjects: | B
Inner unity
B Luke 7:36-50 B Christianity B Language of the pericope |
Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | The difficulty and the ambiguous nature of any distinction between Luke and his possible non-Marken information with regard to Lk 7:36-50 are exposed. This is shown by means of three topics: the language of the pericope, consideration of the story in the context of the Gospel as a whole, and the inner contradictions and inconsistencies claimed by scholars. As we now have it, the pericope is a reasonably coherent whole that fits well into the world of Lukan narrative and theology. Apart from the use of Mark, its sources are hard to ascertain. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2518-4628 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Neotestamentica
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.10520/AJA2548356_535 |