De l'authenticité de la finale de Marc
The problem of the twofold ending of Mark is classical. A reassessment suggests two conclusions: first, the original ending of that Gospel was the first one (16:8 'for they were afraid'); second, the longer ending (16:9-20) was written as a conclusion of the four Gospels, when Mark was the...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | French |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Peeters
2022
|
| In: |
Revue biblique
Year: 2022, Volume: 129, Issue: 4, Pages: 589-604 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
End
/ Bible. Markusevangelium 16,8
/ Bible. Markusevangelium 16,9-20
|
| IxTheo Classification: | HC New Testament KAB Church history 30-500; early Christianity |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | The problem of the twofold ending of Mark is classical. A reassessment suggests two conclusions: first, the original ending of that Gospel was the first one (16:8 'for they were afraid'); second, the longer ending (16:9-20) was written as a conclusion of the four Gospels, when Mark was the last one, and it remained attached to it when the order was altered. Un réexamen du problème classique de la double finale de Marc suggère deux conclusions: d’une part, la première finale «car elles avaient peur» (16,8) correspond à l’original; d’autre part, la finale longue (16,9-20) était à l’origine une conclusion des quatre évangiles, quand Mc était le dernier, et c’est par accident qu’ensuite elle est restée attachée à cet évangile lorsque l’ordre a changé. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2466-8583 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Revue biblique
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.2143/RBI.129.4.3291123 |