A word from a seminarian . . . Beth Moore, the Great Goddess: Rushing’s feminine archetypes and the “Go home” controversy
Society employs feminine archetypes to construct rigid standards and expectations for women. The Southern Baptist Convention (SBC) uses interpretation of selected biblical texts to construct the feminine archetype of “the submissive woman,” a tactic not unlike the patriarchal subversion of the Great...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Sage
2022
|
In: |
Review and expositor
Year: 2022, Volume: 119, Issue: 3/4, Pages: 205-219 |
IxTheo Classification: | HA Bible KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history KBQ North America KDG Free church NBE Anthropology NCC Social ethics |
Further subjects: | B
Phoebe Biblical character
B Complementarianism B feminine archetype B Southern Baptist Convention (SBC) B Beth Moore B John MacArthur B “Go home” |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | Society employs feminine archetypes to construct rigid standards and expectations for women. The Southern Baptist Convention (SBC) uses interpretation of selected biblical texts to construct the feminine archetype of “the submissive woman,” a tactic not unlike the patriarchal subversion of the Great Goddess myth. The SBC expects women to submit to the authority of men and to teachings that exclude women from holding leadership positions. This article examines the ongoing debate over the role of women within the SBC, using the statements of John MacArthur and Beth Moore as artifact and exemplar, including a comparison of their competing interpretations of the New Testament figure Phoebe. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2052-9449 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Review and expositor
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/00346373231165657 |