Author’s Response
This essay aims to reply to the three essays devoted to Systematic Theology, volume 2. Common to all three essays is the conviction that my Trinitarian theology exhibits a kind of unicity that gives rise to inconsistencies of method and worries in matters of doctrine. My reply lays out several forms...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Contributors: | ; ; |
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
2023
|
In: |
International journal of systematic theology
Year: 2023, Volume: 25, Issue: 4, Pages: 555-566 |
IxTheo Classification: | HA Bible KAB Church history 30-500; early Christianity NBC Doctrine of God |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | This essay aims to reply to the three essays devoted to Systematic Theology, volume 2. Common to all three essays is the conviction that my Trinitarian theology exhibits a kind of unicity that gives rise to inconsistencies of method and worries in matters of doctrine. My reply lays out several forms of unity and details how I hope to present proper uniformity in form and matter of dogmatics. A precis of my underlying Doctrine of Scripture and my forthcoming Christology is appended as well, as these prove central to the essayists' queries about the volume. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1468-2400 |
Reference: | Kritik von "‘The Bible is not “like any other book”’: Katherine Sonderegger and the Bible as Vestigium Trinitatis (2023)"
Kritik von "A Treasure Hidden in a Field: Katherine Sonderegger on Scripture (2023)" Kritik von "To Think and to Speak of the Living God: Katherine Sonderegger's Systematic Theology, Volume 2 (2023)" |
Contains: | Enthalten in: International journal of systematic theology
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/ijst.12682 |