Religion(s) in Seals: Old and New Challenges

Although seals are very mobile items and often reused, and although they can be regarded as mass media products given their large distribution in time, space, and different social classes, they are often used by scholars as a tool to map political, cultural, and religious borders. This contribution...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Porzia, Fabio 1984- (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: 2024
Dans: Near Eastern archaeology
Année: 2024, Volume: 87, Numéro: 1, Pages: 4-13
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Sceau / Cachet / Iconographie / Religion / Levante (Süd) / Histoire 1000 avant J.-C.-1 avant J.-C. / Culture / ethnos (Locutions)
Classifications IxTheo:HB Ancien Testament
KBL Proche-Orient et Afrique du Nord
Sujets non-standardisés:B Adaptation
Accès en ligne: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Résumé:Although seals are very mobile items and often reused, and although they can be regarded as mass media products given their large distribution in time, space, and different social classes, they are often used by scholars as a tool to map political, cultural, and religious borders. This contribution aims at reassessing the validity of using religious iconography on seals from the first-millennium BCE southern Levant for the study of ancient religion(s) from three aspects: that religion is thematized beyond ethnic borders; that religious motifs are studied beyond the quest of their origin; and that divine images are studied beyond the compulsion to provide them with proper names. Introducing the notion of adaption as a short form for adoption and adaptation, this article supports a more nuanced understanding of seal iconography in terms of shared cultural infrastructure and a common cultural landscape.
ISSN:2325-5404
Contient:Enthalten in: Near Eastern archaeology
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1086/727583