II. In Defense of the Stables at Megiddo
After several seasons of excavations at Megiddo, I believe I have proven that the two groups of buildings commonly referred to as "Solomon’s Stables" are not Solomonic but must date to approximately the reign of Ahab.1 However, I do not challenge the conclusion of the original Megiddo exca...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Biblical Archaeology Society
1976
|
| In: |
The Biblical archaeology review
Year: 1976, Volume: 2, Issue: 3 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | After several seasons of excavations at Megiddo, I believe I have proven that the two groups of buildings commonly referred to as "Solomon’s Stables" are not Solomonic but must date to approximately the reign of Ahab.1 However, I do not challenge the conclusion of the original Megiddo excavators that the buildings are indeed stables. […] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0098-9444 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: The Biblical archaeology review
|