The Gospel of the Ebionites and the Synoptic Problem
David B. Sloan and James R. Edwards have revived the antique hypothesis that there was a single Gospel according to the Hebrews underlying the diverse patristic testimonies about it and that it was a significant source behind the Synoptic tradition. Specifically, Sloan and Edwards equate this recons...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2024
|
| In: |
The catholic biblical quarterly
Jahr: 2024, Band: 86, Heft: 2, Seiten: 300-325 |
| normierte Schlagwort(-folgen): | B
Streeter, Burnett Hillman 1874-1937
/ Evangelium secundum Hebraeos
/ Logienquelle
/ Synoptische Frage
/ Epiphanius, Constantiensis 315-403
/ Ebionitenevangelium
/ Bibel. Lukasevangelium
/ Sondergut
|
| IxTheo Notationen: | HC Neues Testament HD Frühjudentum KAB Kirchengeschichte 30-500; Frühchristentum |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Redaction Criticism
B Synoptic Problem B Gospel of the Ebionites |
| Online-Zugang: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Zusammenfassung: | David B. Sloan and James R. Edwards have revived the antique hypothesis that there was a single Gospel according to the Hebrews underlying the diverse patristic testimonies about it and that it was a significant source behind the Synoptic tradition. Specifically, Sloan and Edwards equate this reconstructed text with either Q or L, respectively, two hypothetical sources in B. H. Streeter’s classic solution to the Synoptic Problem. In this article, I defend the common scholarly view that the text known to Epiphanius, which modern scholars entitle as the Gospel of the Ebionites to distinguish it from the Gospel according to the Hebrews, was a Greek text that, at points, harmonizes passages from the Synoptics. I will focus on this Gospel’s baptism narrative to demonstrate that it replicates Matthean and Lucan redactional elements, thus making it unlikely to be the source of the Synoptic double tradition or the Lucan Sondergut. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2163-2529 |
| Enthält: | Enthalten in: The catholic biblical quarterly
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1353/cbq.2024.a924367 |