Commission, Mission and Migration in Acts: A Response to Ekaputra Tupamahu
This response to the article by our friend and colleague Ekaputra Tupamahu expresses features of both appreciation and dissent. We should note at the outset, however, that a key part of the difference is likely semantic: how “mission” is defined. It may be more a specific model of mission to which D...
Authors: | ; |
---|---|
Contributors: | |
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Brill
2024
|
In: |
Pneuma
Year: 2024, Volume: 46, Issue: 2, Pages: 196-215 |
IxTheo Classification: | CH Christianity and Society FD Contextual theology HC New Testament KBS Australia; Oceania KDG Free church RJ Mission; missiology VB Hermeneutics; Philosophy |
Further subjects: | B
Migration
B Commission B Acts B Mission (international law |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | This response to the article by our friend and colleague Ekaputra Tupamahu expresses features of both appreciation and dissent. We should note at the outset, however, that a key part of the difference is likely semantic: how “mission” is defined. It may be more a specific model of mission to which Dr. Tupamahu objects, rather than every model of mission. In fact, as dialogue provides clarification, I suspect we have significant common ground. The colonial model of mission followed the model of Paul’s rivals in Galatia; Paul proclaimed the kingdom good news in a way that did not impose extrabiblical Jewish culture on gentiles. Indeed, Acts includes a clearly Asian mission to bring the good news to Europe. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1570-0747 |
Reference: | Kritik von "Is Acts Really “The Most Overtly Missionary Book”?: Challenging Whiteness in the Interpretation of Acts (2024)"
|
Contains: | Enthalten in: Pneuma
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15700747-bja10109 |