The Notion of Textual Comparison between the Judean Desert Biblical Texts and of Variant Readings

Were there any so-called “variants” in the scrolls? The assumption of contact between any two scrolls has been inferred from corrective additions and deletions. It has usually been claimed that corrections were based on MT. I divide the scrolls into different groups because in each group there could...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tov, ʿEmanuʾel 1941- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: The Hebrew University of Jerusalem 2024
In: Textus
Year: 2024, Volume: 33, Issue: 2, Pages: 111-141
Further subjects:B Textual Criticism
B Judean Desert Scrolls
B corrections scribal errors
B Scribes
B textual comparison
B variant readings
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Summary:Were there any so-called “variants” in the scrolls? The assumption of contact between any two scrolls has been inferred from corrective additions and deletions. It has usually been claimed that corrections were based on MT. I divide the scrolls into different groups because in each group there could have been a different incentive for correction towards an external source. The strength of the argument depends on this division. In an analysis of the evidence (see the Appendix) in each of the groups, a different correction pattern was detected, and often the corrections were revised towards a text different from MT. In all these cases, the corrections were not made towards external sources, but the source of the scrolls. Strengthened by theoretical arguments, we suggest that the scrolls contain no notations of variants, that is, elements that were copied as variants from other scrolls or were corrected according to external sources.
ISSN:2589-255X
Contains:Enthalten in: Textus
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/2589255X-bja10044