The Rabbinic Ban on Childless Judges Serving on the Sanhedrin: Fatherhood, Cruelty, lineage, and Roman Law
Tannaitic sources ban childless elders from serving on a court that deliberates on capital cases or issues halakhic rulings. Medieval and later commentators linked this criterion to compassion, claiming that men who lack offspring are typically cruel and therefore unfit for these roles. This explana...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
University of Pennsylvania Press
2024
|
| In: |
AJS review
Year: 2024, Volume: 48, Issue: 2, Pages: 360-389 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | Tannaitic sources ban childless elders from serving on a court that deliberates on capital cases or issues halakhic rulings. Medieval and later commentators linked this criterion to compassion, claiming that men who lack offspring are typically cruel and therefore unfit for these roles. This explanation has been widely accepted by modern scholars. In this article, I challenge the assumptions that tannaitic sources perceive of individuals without children as callous, and that these texts imply that caring for a child fosters greater mercy for strangers. Rather, I show that this ban originally related to the social and religious status of childless men. In addition, a few sources indicate that fatherhood was a key qualification for candidates for public roles in the Roman Empire during the first and second centuries CE. Thus, I examine the contemporaneous Roman milieu to further support my suggestion that status was at the crux of this exclusion. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1475-4541 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Association for Jewish Studies, AJS review
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1353/ajs.2024.a946701 |