Thomas Wagstaffe and His Unpublished Account of Codex Vaticanus (Vat. gr. 1209)

Although the manuscript had already been used from the sixteenth century onward, scholarly knowledge of the famous Codex Vaticanus (Vat. gr. 1209 in the Vatican Library) was very limited even in the first half of the eighteenth century. Scholars outside Rome had to rely on secondary and imprecise in...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Yi, An-Ting (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2022
In: Annali di storia dell' esegesi
Year: 2022, Volume: 39, Issue: 2, Pages: 417-442
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Codex Vaticanus / Textual criticism / Science / History / History 1700-1800
IxTheo Classification:HA Bible
Further subjects:B Eighteenth Century
B Textual Criticism
B history of scholarship
B Codex Vaticanus
B Thomas Wagstaffe
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:Although the manuscript had already been used from the sixteenth century onward, scholarly knowledge of the famous Codex Vaticanus (Vat. gr. 1209 in the Vatican Library) was very limited even in the first half of the eighteenth century. Scholars outside Rome had to rely on secondary and imprecise information. However, there is one remarkable piece of work that has long been overlooked. Probably during the course of 1738 and 1739, Thomas Wagstaffe prepared a detailed account of Codex Vaticanus, including not only general introductions but also analyses of different dimensions of the manuscript. Wagstaffe’s account was never published, and it is currently preserved in the "Biblioteca Nazionale Centrale di Roma". Based on the personal examination of this archive entry, this article gives relevant historical contexts, details its current state of conservation and content, provides transcriptions of some notable portions, and offers a critical evaluation of Wagstaffe’s descriptions and judgements of the manuscript. These findings on the one hand show the pioneering nature of the work, and on the other hand shed light on the history of biblical textual scholarship.
ISSN:1120-4001
Contains:Enthalten in: Annali di storia dell' esegesi
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.69071/112221