What if Dru Johnson Is Right?: Possible Implications of Hebraic Philosophy for Systematic Theology and the Doctrine of God

What if Dru Johnson is correct that the Bible is philosophy? I consider the implications of this for systematic theology and the doctrine of God. I argue that classical theism, Reformed Thomism, and other such positions are rival philosophical schools of thought that contradict the Bible’s philosoph...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mullins, R. T. (Author)
Contributors: Johnson, Dru 1974- (Bibliographic antecedent)
Format: Electronic Review
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2024
In: Philosophia Christi
Year: 2024, Volume: 26, Issue: 2, Pages: 279-293
Review of:Biblical philosophy (Cambridge, United Kingdom : Cambridge University Press, 2021) (Mullins, R. T.)
IxTheo Classification:AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
HA Bible
NAA Systematic theology
NBC Doctrine of God
VA Philosophy
Further subjects:B Book review
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:What if Dru Johnson is correct that the Bible is philosophy? I consider the implications of this for systematic theology and the doctrine of God. I argue that classical theism, Reformed Thomism, and other such positions are rival philosophical schools of thought that contradict the Bible’s philosophical reflections on God.
ISSN:2640-2580
Reference:Kommentar in "A Brief Response to Meek, Morris, and Mullins (2024)"
Contains:Enthalten in: Philosophia Christi
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.5840/pc202426222