What if Dru Johnson Is Right?: Possible Implications of Hebraic Philosophy for Systematic Theology and the Doctrine of God
What if Dru Johnson is correct that the Bible is philosophy? I consider the implications of this for systematic theology and the doctrine of God. I argue that classical theism, Reformed Thomism, and other such positions are rival philosophical schools of thought that contradict the Bible’s philosoph...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Collaborateurs: | |
| Type de support: | Électronique Critique |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publié: |
2024
|
| Dans: |
Philosophia Christi
Année: 2024, Volume: 26, Numéro: 2, Pages: 279-293 |
| Compte rendu de: | Biblical philosophy (Cambridge, United Kingdom : Cambridge University Press, 2021) (Mullins, R. T.)
|
| Classifications IxTheo: | AB Philosophie de la religion HA Bible NAA Théologie systématique NBC Dieu VA Philosophie |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Compte-rendu de lecture
|
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Résumé: | What if Dru Johnson is correct that the Bible is philosophy? I consider the implications of this for systematic theology and the doctrine of God. I argue that classical theism, Reformed Thomism, and other such positions are rival philosophical schools of thought that contradict the Bible’s philosophical reflections on God. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2640-2580 |
| Référence: | Kommentar in "A Brief Response to Meek, Morris, and Mullins (2024)"
|
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Philosophia Christi
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.5840/pc202426222 |