On the meaning of Job 26:9
Attribution of the speeches to the various figures in the concluding cycles of the Jobian debates is an unsettled issue. The variety of proposals is baffling and hardly any agreement exists. Clines (1960:628) claims that "the evidence of general disarray in the attribution of speeches from 24:1...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
2014
|
| In: |
Journal for semitics
Year: 2014, Volume: 23, Issue: 2, Pages: 404-422 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
| Summary: | Attribution of the speeches to the various figures in the concluding cycles of the Jobian debates is an unsettled issue. The variety of proposals is baffling and hardly any agreement exists. Clines (1960:628) claims that "the evidence of general disarray in the attribution of speeches from 24:18 to chap. 28 suggests rather that the text has been subjected to some damage in the course of transmission." This study focuses on 26:9 in the context of the unit consisting of vv. 7-13. |
|---|---|
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal for semitics
|
| Persistent identifiers: | HDL: 10520/EJC166273 |