An Alternative Explanation for the Alleged ‘Imperatival’ Participles of Romans 12:9-21
The participles of Romans 12:9-21 have occasioned much discussion among grammarians and commentators. The primary debate concerns whether the participles are functioning imperativally or whether they might be connected with a finite verb in the context of the passage. This article suggests that the...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
2010
|
| In: |
Tyndale bulletin
Year: 2010, Volume: 61, Issue: 2, Pages: 311-316 |
| Further subjects: | B
romans
B copula B participles B Epistles B greek syntax B paul B greek verb B New Testament B Imperative |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Summary: | The participles of Romans 12:9-21 have occasioned much discussion among grammarians and commentators. The primary debate concerns whether the participles are functioning imperativally or whether they might be connected with a finite verb in the context of the passage. This article suggests that the participles might indeed be connected with a finite verb, but one that is unexpressed in the passage. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0082-7118 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Tyndale bulletin
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.53751/001c.29291 |