Conceptualising Fulfilment in Matthew

The question of how to understand the formula citations in the Gospel of Matthew is as important as it is disputed. This study begins by reviewing the avenues previously pursued for making sense of this collection of texts. Finding that typology is a helpful but ultimately insufficient means of maki...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kirk, J. R. Daniel 1975- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2008
In: Tyndale bulletin
Year: 2008, Volume: 59, Issue: 1, Pages: 77-98
Further subjects:B use of ot in nt
B Synoptic Gospels
B Narrative
B Matthew
B Gospels
B Typology
B New Testament
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic
Description
Summary:The question of how to understand the formula citations in the Gospel of Matthew is as important as it is disputed. This study begins by reviewing the avenues previously pursued for making sense of this collection of texts. Finding that typology is a helpful but ultimately insufficient means of making sense of Matthew’s formula citations, a diachronic, narratival typology is proposed. Rather than seeing Jesus as the one who embodies abstract or limited typological concepts, we see that his life takes the shape of Israel’s story. In assigning Israel’s role to Jesus, however, Matthew also opens up new avenues for interpreting this story. And so we find Jesus giving new substance to a narrative whose shape is given by the scriptures of Israel. This conception of narrative embodiment in Matthew holds promise not only for understanding Jesus’ relationship to the prophets but also for understanding his relationship to the law.
ISSN:2752-7042
Contains:Enthalten in: Tyndale bulletin
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.53751/001c.29249